This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Fix gold's understanding of ARM v4T/v5T interworking

From: Matthew Gretton-Dann <matthew dot gretton-dann at arm dot com>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
Cc: "binutils at sourceware dot org" <binutils at sourceware dot org>, "gingold at adacore dot com" <gingold at adacore dot com>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:27:21 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix gold's understanding of ARM v4T/v5T interworking
References: <4E80908B.4080309@arm.com> <mcr62j2l4oy.fsf@dhcp-172-18-216-180.mtv.corp.google.com>

Ian, Tristan,

On 02/11/11 19:11, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

Matthew Gretton-Dann<matthew.gretton-dann@arm.com> writes:

2011-09-20 Matthew Gretton-Dann<matthew.gretton-dann@arm.com>

   	* arm.cc (Target_arm::Target_arm): Remove initialisation of
	may_use_blx_
	(Target_arm::may_use_blx): Remove method.
	(Target_arm::set_may_use_blx): Likewise.
	(Target_arm::may_use_v4t_interworking): New method.
	(Target_arm::may_use_v5t_interworking): Likewise.
	(Target_arm::may_use_blx_): Remove member variable.
	(Arm_relocate_functions::arm_branch_common): Check for v5T
	interworking.
	(Arm_relocate_functions::thumb_branch_common): Likewise.
	(Reloc_stub::stub_type_for_reloc): Likewise.
	(Target_arm::do_finalize_sections): Correct interworking checks.
	* testsuite/Makefile.am: Add new tests.
	* testsuite/Makefile.in: Regenerate.
	* testsuite/arm_farcall_arm_arm.s: New test.
	* testsuite/arm_farcall_arm_arm.sh: Likewise.
	* testsuite/arm_farcall_arm_thumb.s: Likewise.
	* testsuite/arm_farcall_arm_thumb.sh: Likewise.
	* testsuite/arm_farcall_thumb_arm.s: Likewise.
	* testsuite/arm_farcall_thumb_arm.sh: Likewise.
	* testsuite/arm_farcall_thumb_thumb.s: Likewise.
	* testsuite/arm_farcall_thumb_thumb.sh: Likewise.

Committed.

Sorry for the delay.

Are you happy for this patch to be backported to the 2.22 branch?

Thanks,

Matt

--
Matthew Gretton-Dann
Principal Engineer, PD Software - Tools, ARM Ltd

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFA] Fix gold's understanding of ARM v4T/v5T interworking
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- Re: [RFA] Fix gold's understanding of ARM v4T/v5T interworking
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- Re: [RFA] Fix gold's understanding of ARM v4T/v5T interworking
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]