This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 07/05/2011 16:58, H.J. Lu wrote: > On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 07/05/2011 16:06, H.J. Lu wrote: >>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Dave Korn wrote: >>>> Any comments on the implementation, while we're waiting? Or OK as it is? >>>> >>> Do you have a testcase to show it fails without your change? >> Nope, but I guess we could try and extract one from the gcc/g++ testsuite; >> pretty much every testcase that involves EH or typeinfo is busted without it. > > I don't see any LTO failures on Linux/x86 with the current BFD linker. > I'll have to retest then. I did initially get this many (attached) failures, but it's possible that Alan's pr12365 (or related) changes resolved them somehow. cheers, DaveK
Attachment:
summary2.log
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |