This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: [AVR] Add support for XMEGA arch and devices.
- From: "Weddington, Eric" <Eric dot Weddington at atmel dot com>
- To: "Tom Tromey" <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sourceware dot org>, "Denis Chertykov" <chertykov at gmail dot com>, "Anatoly Sokolov" <aesok at post dot ru>, "Joerg Wunsch" <joerg_wunsch at uriah dot heep dot sax dot de>
- Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 14:26:14 -0600
- Subject: RE: [AVR] Add support for XMEGA arch and devices.
- References: <8D64F155F1C88743BFDC71288E8E2DA8F415BB@csomb01.corp.atmel.com> <m3lj06rjrn.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Tromey [mailto:tromey@redhat.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 2:19 PM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: binutils@sourceware.org; Denis Chertykov; Anatoly Sokolov; Joerg
> Wunsch
> Subject: Re: [AVR] Add support for XMEGA arch and devices.
>
> >>>>> "Eric" == Weddington, Eric <Eric.Weddington@atmel.com> writes:
>
> Eric> Attached is the patch to add support for the AVR XMEGA family of
> Eric> devices. This adds support for new architectures (groupings),
> Eric> device names, and support for new opcodes that are used in this
> Eric> family.
>
> I think this change caused a build failure for me.
> I've appended the failure.
>
> I am on x86 F13; I always configure with --enable-targets=all.
Hi Tom,
Thanks for letting me know. In my patch submission I asked if I needed to regen bfd/bfd-in2.h and commit that file with everything else. Denis wasn't sure. I went ahead and committed everything else, and I was waiting to hear from someone on the list about bfd-in2.h.
Could that be the issue?
Sorry for the hassle.
Eric