This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: Add 32bit x86-64 support to binutils

From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor dot com>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 12:11:44 -0800
Subject: Re: RFC: Add 32bit x86-64 support to binutils
References: <20101230182308.GA21296@intel.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1012301831270.30514@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <AANLkTi=5rp8+1_h=Bt-FLnVW0mDY6N_tLb020XHr4d1n@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1012301905400.30514@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <AANLkTikpMu3vyYBrsk_r0aHF5_O_xeshbdSfu+igjjpn@mail.gmail.com>

On 12/30/2010 11:53 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> 
> Would be nice if LFS would be mandatory on the new ABI, thus
> off_t being 64bits.
> 

Yes, although that's a higher-order thing.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

References:
- RFC: Add 32bit x86-64 support to binutils
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: RFC: Add 32bit x86-64 support to binutils
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: RFC: Add 32bit x86-64 support to binutils
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: RFC: Add 32bit x86-64 support to binutils
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: RFC: Add 32bit x86-64 support to binutils
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]