This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Bug for darwin + windows

From: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
To: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
Cc: binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 14:08:06 +1030
Subject: Re: Bug for darwin + windows
References: <AANLkTinnXi=SEP5+gagTQW33WK00AQ_5jxdW5krNM9py@mail.gmail.com> <20101210000209.GJ15607@bubble.grove.modra.org> <AANLkTik_9oeJauBDgffcoEMqFG=1aSnuhyq1ODg1ydOz@mail.gmail.com> <20101210040106.GM15607@bubble.grove.modra.org> <AANLkTikTg0ii=QoDnkXrvWx=GqugzhdQuwQitCqOF5To@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:07:49PM -0500, NightStrike wrote:
> The shadowed variable is within binutils... from ldmain.h to libbfd.h.
>  You are refusing to address that within your own product?

Exactly.  A warning about a shadow with scope of a prototype parameter
list is totally useless.  Upgrade (or even downgrade) your gcc.

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

References:
- Bug for darwin + windows
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: Bug for darwin + windows
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Bug for darwin + windows
  - From: NightStrike
- Re: Bug for darwin + windows
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Bug for darwin + windows
  - From: NightStrike

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]