This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Review of --enable-gold=both patch
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>
- Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, Paolo Bonzini <bonzini at gnu dot org>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>, Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 09:09:05 -0800
- Subject: Re: Review of --enable-gold=both patch
- References: <4C27E695.9070802@codesourcery.com> <4C286200.30402@gnu.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1006281009290.17565@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4C2886C7.4040408@gnu.org> <4C28CA2A.7060703@codesourcery.com> <4C28CE9C.9030809@gnu.org> <4C28D9F1.6030309@codesourcery.com> <4CC83135.4080603@ubuntu.com> <4CCA91ED.7010909@redhat.com> <4CCAE033.3010009@ubuntu.com> <4CCAE45F.20201@gnu.org> <4CDB3413.1090900@ubuntu.com> <4CEBB272.3080708@redhat.com> <4CEBC0F4.7030404@ubuntu.com>
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> On 23.11.2010 13:24, Nick Clifton wrote:
>>
>> Hi Matthias,
>>
>> [Sorry about the delay in replying - I am in a bit of a muddle right now].
>>
>>> The attached patch implements this proposal, tested the combinations
>>> above, and disabling ld without gold (leading to an error).
>>>
>>> I did choose to always install the bfd linker as ld.bfd and the gold
>>> linker as ld.gold, and pointing the link to one of the above.
>>>
>>> Nick, is this ok with you?
>>
>> Yes, it is fine. Thanks for doing this.
>
> checked in in gcc as r167076. ?Nick, Tristan, could you check it into
> binutils trunk and branch?
>
Binutils is broken now:
http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12258
--
H.J.