This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] adding .gitignore to toplevel

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com>, Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 00:42:35 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFC] adding .gitignore to toplevel
References: <201011151744.42385.vapier@gentoo.org> <201011161229.48637.vapier@gentoo.org> <20101116213333.GA5527@bubble.grove.modra.org>

On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 16:33:33 Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:29:47PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > *.info
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > dir.info
> 
> Already covered above.  However, the main reason I'm replying is to
> note that binutils/sysroff.info is not a generated file.

like "config.h", i think this is an extreme exception and not "the rule".  so 
here too i think it'll be a better idea to add "!sysroff.info" to the 
binutils/.gitignore.

i'll follow up with sub-dir specific ignores after i merge this.  considering 
cvs is the commit tree atm, i dont think this is a pressing matter.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] adding .gitignore to toplevel
  - From: Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen

References:
- [RFC] adding .gitignore to toplevel
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: [RFC] adding .gitignore to toplevel
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: [RFC] adding .gitignore to toplevel
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]