This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH][GAS/ARM] Better handling of difference between a symbol and an undefined symbol.
Sounds like a good suggestion, I will change the test case then.
在 2010年9月27日下午6:35,Dave Korn <dave.korn.cygwin@gmail.com> 寫道:
> On 28/09/2010 00:53, Doug Kwan (關振德) wrote:
>> Absolutely, I would like to use something like:
>>
>> .section .data.i,"a"
>> i:
>> .long 0
>>
>> .section .data.j,"a"
>> j:
>> .long i - (. - .L1)
>> .L1:
>>
>> The problem is that I cannot guarantee that it assembles for all
>> targets. Is there a good way to test that?
>
> I think if you just use a .section directive with only a section name and no
> flags, that ought to assemble everywhere. Since it's an assembler-only test
> that doesn't need a compiler, you can easily run a script that builds and
> tests binutils for a whole huge list of cross-targets and see whether it fails
> anywhere. (I'll send you a copy off-list if you'd like.)
>
> cheers,
> DaveK
>