This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] fix typos in comments
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Quentin Neill <quentin dot neill dot gnu at gmail dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 08:55:06 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix typos in comments
- References: <AANLkTiksn=neQqhGe98xSS9rT-p4ofCSKkMKE+h8k7a_@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Quentin Neill
<quentin.neill.gnu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Trivial patch to fix typos in comments in i386-opc.h. ?Okay to commit?
> --
> Quentin Neill
>
>
> opcodes/
> ? ?* i386-opc.h (enum): Fix typos in comments.
>
> Index: opcodes/i386-opc.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/opcodes/i386-opc.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.73
> diff -u -d -u -p -r1.73 i386-opc.h
> --- opcodes/i386-opc.h ?5 Jul 2010 16:40:32 -0000 ? 1.73
> +++ opcodes/i386-opc.h ?3 Aug 2010 15:14:19 -0000
> @@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ enum
> ? Cpu586,
> ? /* i686 or better required */
> ? Cpu686,
> - ?/* CLFLUSH Instuction support required */
> + ?/* CLFLUSH Instruction support required */
> ? CpuClflush,
> - ?/* SYSCALL Instuctions support required */
> + ?/* SYSCALL Instructions support required */
> ? CpuSYSCALL,
> ? /* Floating point support required */
> ? Cpu8087,
> @@ -92,9 +92,9 @@ enum
> ? CpuAVX,
> ? /* Intel L1OM support required */
> ? CpuL1OM,
> - ?/* Xsave/xrstor New Instuctions support required */
> + ?/* Xsave/xrstor New Instructions support required */
> ? CpuXsave,
> - ?/* Xsaveopt New Instuctions support required */
> + ?/* Xsaveopt New Instructions support required */
> ? CpuXsaveopt,
> ? /* AES support required */
> ? CpuAES,
> @@ -108,11 +108,11 @@ enum
> ? CpuXOP,
> ? /* LWP support required */
> ? CpuLWP,
> - ?/* MOVBE Instuction support required */
> + ?/* MOVBE Instruction support required */
> ? CpuMovbe,
> ? /* EPT Instructions required */
> ? CpuEPT,
> - ?/* RDTSCP Instuction support required */
> + ?/* RDTSCP Instruction support required */
> ? CpuRdtscp,
> ? /* FSGSBASE Instructions required */
> ? CpuFSGSBase,
>
OK. Thanks.
--
H.J.