This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Extremly slow assembler on i686-pc-mingw32


On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 6:38 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Rainer Emrich
> <rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de> wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Am 22.03.2010 00:32, schrieb H.J. Lu:
>>> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Rainer Emrich
>>> <rainer@emrich-ebersheim.de> wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>>
>>>> This is for binutils cvs from today.
>>>>
>>>> The execution time for gas is several times higher than for gas from binutils-2.20.
>>>> Discovered during gcc bootstrapping.
>>>>
>>>> Any ideas?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is that specific to mingw? Can you send the me .s file? I can run it with
>>> cross binutils see if it also happens on Linux.
>>>
>> I don't know if that's specific to mingw. I first discovered it today and it's
>> not specific to any source AFAIK. The time for bootstrapping gcc is more than
>> doubled in my setup. I'm bootstrapping with make -j 8 on a quad core system.
>>
>> So, I try to dig into it further tomorrow evening.
>>
>
> It may be caused by
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2010-02/msg00179.html
>
> I will see what I can do.
>

I checked in a fix. Please try again.

Thanks for your report.

-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]