This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: m68k no longer supported?

From: Josef Wolf <jw at raven dot inka dot de>
To: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2010 23:10:20 +0100
Subject: Re: m68k no longer supported?
References: <20100205182248.GE28667@raven.wolf.lan> <20100205183653.GA21701@caradoc.them.org> <20100205184914.GA22398@raven.wolf.lan> <20100205190528.GA24047@caradoc.them.org> <20100206100623.GB22398@raven.wolf.lan> <m24olubqdo.fsf@whitebox.home> <20100206125454.GC22398@raven.wolf.lan> <m2wryq5qkf.fsf@igel.home> <20100206200549.GD22398@raven.wolf.lan> <m2sk9e5c6l.fsf@igel.home>

On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 09:41:54PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Josef Wolf <jw@raven.inka.de> writes:
> 
> > OK. So how do I get ieee-695 format then?
> 
> You have it already, objcopy is your friend.

Sorry, but I'm still confused. how can objcopy support a format that was not
compiled in?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Joel Sherrill
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Josef Wolf
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Josef Wolf
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Josef Wolf
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Josef Wolf
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Josef Wolf
- Re: m68k no longer supported?
  - From: Andreas Schwab

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]