This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump

From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de>
To: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org
Cc: bonzini at gnu dot org
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:29:07 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump
References: <20090815112928.GB5396@gmx.de> <20090815113356.GD20172@gmx.de> <84fc9c000908150448p73a22bbbm59c7abbccfc7f225@mail.gmail.com> <20090815122258.GF20172@gmx.de>

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 02:22:58PM CEST:
> 
> Since its release on 2009-07-26, Autoconf 2.64 has not seen a regression
> that impacted GCC's use of it AFAICS (and only minor ones otherwise).

Ah, hm, except for
<http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.sysutils.autoconf.bugs/6839>
which is still pending.

Hmm.  Paolo, do you agree that we can probably fix this in
config/override.m4 if we should?

Sorry about that,
Ralf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump
  - From: Paolo Bonzini

References:
- Moving to Autoconf 2.64, Automake 1.11
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- [PATCH 4/N] The big bump
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues
- Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH 4/N] The big bump
  - From: Ralf Wildenhues

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]