This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] biarch support for i386-mingw32
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 08:45:16AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Robert Millan<rmh@aybabtu.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Kai,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 09:27:23AM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote:
> >>
> >> This approac seems to be wrong. It makes no sense to change emulation
> >> for i386 pr-coff targets. This would break i386 default.
> >
> > I tested i386-mingw32 and it continues to work. ÂCan you be more specific?
> >
> >> Instead of your patch you should configure options to enable biarch
> >> for binutils here.
> >> At typical multilib version based on i386-*-mingw* can be configured as:
> >> "../configure --prefix=<prefix-dir> --with-sysroot=<prefix-dir>
> >> --target=i686-w64-mingw32
> >> --enable-targets=i686-w64-mingw32,x86_64-w64-mingw32 "
> >>
> >> For me this works pretty well and testsuite run works, too.
> >
> > This works for ld, but then "as --64" won't work. ÂMy goal is to setup a
> > biarch toolchain, which will later need some adjustments in gcc so that
> > "i586-mingw32msvc-gcc -m64" works.
> >
>
> Which version of binutils are you using?
My bad, it seems that I was stuck in the past. Sorry for bothering.
Btw, does the same (or a similar) approach work for gcc?
--
Robert Millan
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."