This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFA: broken strip/objcopy

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
Cc: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:28:17 -0700
Subject: Re: RFA: broken strip/objcopy
References: <90baa01f0904240320i3d195accpd7273504b87fabcf@mail.gmail.com> <90baa01f0904240600id160faeic26899e47d283e15@mail.gmail.com> <6dc9ffc80904240641y9bb855fne5a3779b2b78c161@mail.gmail.com> <49F23EE4.5020408@gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Dave Korn
<dave.korn.cygwin@googlemail.com> wrote:
> H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 6:00 AM, Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Ah, I found the major issue here
>>>
>>> 2009-04-17 ?H.J. Lu ?<hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
>>>
>>> ? ? ? ?PR binutils/10074
>>>
>>> This patch made objcopy and strip for PE-Coff target 32-bit PE only
>>
>> I am trying to understand where the problem is. pe->pe_opthdr is
>> supposed to target independent. Why doesn't it work for w64?
>>
>
> ?It doesn't work on i686-pc-cygwin either. ?I just updated a cvs tree and
> rebuilt it, and now I see:
>

That is what I expected. Please try patch in

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-04/msg00364.html

-- 
H.J.

References:
- RFA: broken strip/objcopy
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: RFA: broken strip/objcopy
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: RFA: broken strip/objcopy
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: RFA: broken strip/objcopy
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]