This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [patch]: dump of PE+ x64 pdata section
H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>> Shouldn't _bfd_pep_print_x64_pdata be renamed to
>>
>> bfd_boolean _bfd_pex64_print_pdata (bfd *, void *);
>>
>>
>
> Or this function should be moved to coff-x86-64.c.
I think the naming is reasonble. PE+ is an object file format; x86_64 may
be currently the only CPU that uses it, but it's conceivable there might be
non-x64 pdata sections in some future non-x64 architecture that uses the same
format.
Moving it might well be a good idea though. The ARM one,
_bfd_XX_print_ce_compressed_pdata probably doesn't really belong there either.
cheers,
DaveK