This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Discrepancy with .reloc section between PE and PE+ emulations when linking -r.

From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn dot cygwin at googlemail dot com>
Cc: Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:36:39 +0000
Subject: Re: Discrepancy with .reloc section between PE and PE+ emulations when linking -r.
References: <4994E930.5000601@gmail.com> <4994EEE9.6040006@gmail.com> <90baa01f0902130145w49022815ge09cc58f44d82dfa@mail.gmail.com> <49954732.1040506@gmail.com> <499547A9.7@redhat.com> <49956B84.4050109@gmail.com>

Hi Dave,

ld/ChangeLog

	* emultempl/pe.em (gld_${EMULATION_NAME}_after_open):  Don't emit
	inadvertent .reloc sections caused by refactoring accident.

Approved - please apply.

Cheers
  Nick

References:
- Discrepancy with .reloc section between PE and PE+ emulations when linking -r.
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Discrepancy with .reloc section between PE and PE+ emulations when linking -r.
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Discrepancy with .reloc section between PE and PE+ emulations when linking -r.
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: Discrepancy with .reloc section between PE and PE+ emulations when linking -r.
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: Discrepancy with .reloc section between PE and PE+ emulations when linking -r.
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: Discrepancy with .reloc section between PE and PE+ emulations when linking -r.
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]