This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Discrepancy with .reloc section between PE and PE+ emulations when linking -r.
Dave Korn wrote:
> Testing finished. No regressions, and fixed a bunch of failures on
> sh-unknown-pe:
Just to clarify: I tested linux x {arm-epoc-pe
arm-wince-pe
i386-pc-netbsdpe
i386-pc-pe
i586-pc-interix
i586-unknown-beospe
i686-pc-cygwin
i686-pc-mingw32
mcore-unknown-pe
powerpcle-unknown-pe
sh-unknown-pe
thumb-epoc-pe
x86_64-pc-freebsd
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
x86_64-pc-mingw32}
and cygwin x {arm-epoc-pe
arm-wince-pe
i686-pc-cygwin
i686-pc-mingw32
mcore-unknown-pe
thumb-epoc-pe
x86_64-pc-mingw32}
(I just plucked names out of config.bfd where they were selecting PE vecs.
Turns out that thumb-epoc-pe isn't valid any more, but all the rest compiled
OK and tested the same before as after. If anyone has other targets they want
tested, just ask).
cheers,
DaveK