This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch]: Patch for wince

From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at buzzard dot freeserve dot co dot uk>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, Kai Tietz <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:25:27 +0000
Subject: Re: [patch]: Patch for wince
References: <90baa01f0901010758x16e9c205tf88da08562b84a97@mail.gmail.com> <90baa01f0901022359l1abde930jc9b26aef6ff0a893@mail.gmail.com> <1230981888.18149.2.camel@merlin> <200901052121.31636.pedro@codesourcery.com>

On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 21:21 +0000, Pedro Alves wrote:
> A Saturday 03 January 2009 11:24:48, Richard Earnshaw escreveu:
> > On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 08:59 +0100, Kai Tietz wrote:
> > > 	* windres.c (set_endianess): Get architecture name
> > > 	for triplets like "pe-arm-wince-little".
> > 
> > pe-arm-wince-little isn't a triplet.  It's a quadruplet (three hyphens).
> > 
> > In general these are a bad idea, so where has this come from?
> 
> This is used to distinguish pe-arm-little (for the arm-pe target, which 
> I think was symbian, probably obsolete by now) bfds, from arm-wince-pe (Windows CE) bfds
> in the dll generation in ld/pe-dll.c.
> 

I've just realised that I was reading this as a configure-style triplet,
not as a bfd triplet.  So my concerns aren't relevant.

R.

References:
- [patch]: Patch for wince
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: [patch]: Patch for wince
  - From: Kai Tietz
- Re: [patch]: Patch for wince
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: [patch]: Patch for wince
  - From: Pedro Alves

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]