This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Patch [avr]: makes avr-6 incompatible with other avr architectures

From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
To: "Weddington, Eric" <eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com>
Cc: <binutils at sourceware dot org>, "Denis Chertykov" <chertykov at gmail dot com>, "Anatoliy Sokolov" <aesok at post dot ru>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 14:28:16 +0100
Subject: Re: Patch [avr]: makes avr-6 incompatible with other avr architectures
References: <8840DAA1-9BCE-4D53-B0CF-18E6A6C7E941@adacore.com> <258DDD1F44B6ED4AAFD4370847CF58D50408902D@csomb01.corp.atmel.com> <4786CED0-D575-48F7-A0EF-30AD6C0B0B8E@adacore.com> <258DDD1F44B6ED4AAFD4370847CF58D5040893FF@csomb01.corp.atmel.com>

On Dec 5, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Weddington, Eric wrote:

So I assume you agree with this new restriction.
I do. But Denis has to approve.

Sure.

(I also though about a universal avr architecture but I am
not sure it
is worth)
(I'm not sure how you would construct such a thing. But at this point, it's probably not worth the effort.)

A function that few enough parameters so that they are passed in registers should work on avr6. gcc has to detect such cases.

Tristan.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Patch [avr]: makes avr-6 incompatible with other avr architectures
  - From: Weddington, Eric

References:
- RE: Patch [avr]: makes avr-6 incompatible with other avr architectures
  - From: Weddington, Eric
- Re: Patch [avr]: makes avr-6 incompatible with other avr architectures
  - From: Tristan Gingold
- RE: Patch [avr]: makes avr-6 incompatible with other avr architectures
  - From: Weddington, Eric

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]