Re: RFA: pseudo-relocations for pe targets

[Kai Tietz <Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com>]

> 2008/11/11 Kai Tietz <ktietz70@googlemail.com>:
> > 2008/11/11 Kai Tietz <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com>:
> >>
> >> About this I thought too. I'll modify the patch accordingly to this 
and
> >> re-post it here (plus a pseudo-reloc.c variant for test).
> >>
> >
> > Here comes the changed version plus the pseudo-reloc.c file.
> >
> > Is the patch ok for apply on trunk?
> 
> I noticed that I sent an older pseudo-reloc.c file, so I attached the
> current one.
> 
> I test it on w64 by the following test files:
> a.c: (compiled by gcc -mdll -o a.dll a.c)
> #include <stdio.h>
> 
> typedef struct abc {
>   int a;
>   int b;
>   int c;
> } abc;
> 
> __declspec(dllexport) abc my_abc = { 1,2,3 };
> __declspec(dllexport) int my_a = 2;
> __declspec(dllexport) void show_a(void)
> {
>   printf ("In dll: %d %p, %d %p\n", my_a, &my_a, my_abc.b, &my_abc.b);
> }
> b.c: (compiled by gcc -o b.exe b.c a.dll -Wl,--enable-auto-import)
> #include <stdio.h>
> 
> typedef struct abc {
>   int a;
>   int b;
>   int c;
> } abc;
> 
> extern abc my_abc;
> 
> extern int my_a;
> extern void show_a(void);
> 
> int main()
> {
>   show_a();
>   printf ("In Exe: %d %p, %d %p\n", my_a, &my_a, my_abc.b, &my_abc.b);
>   return 1;
> }
> Result on execution on w64:
> $ ./b.exe
> In dll: 2 000000006608200C, 2 0000000066082004
> In Exe: 2 000000006608200C, 2 0000000066082004

Can I assume that the patch for binutils/ld is ok?

Cheers,
Kai