This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PR 5303, 5755
- From: "=?big5?b?RG91ZyBLd2FuICjD9q62vHcp?=" <dougkwan at google dot com>
- To: binutils at sourceware dot org, dougkwan at google dot com
- Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 16:43:19 -0800
- Subject: Re: PR 5303, 5755
- References: <20080212003037.GD4437@bubble.grove.modra.org>
Do'h. I thought HJ's fix have been accepted. To simplest way to fix
this is to disable to optimization at run-time when splay tree cannot
handle 64 bit bfd_vma. I will fix that and resubmit then.
-Doug
2008/2/11, Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au>:
> In http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00144.html I said I'd
> revert Doug Kwan's speed up for bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line if 64-bit
> target support on a 32-bit host remained broken. HJ has made a number
> of attempts to cure the underlying problem in libiberty/splay-tree.c,
> but so far hasn't managed to convince anyone to apply anything.
>
> In http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00027.html Doug said
> there were a couple of ways to fix the problem inside BFD without
> touching libiberty, and offered to make the changes. No one commented
> on which way was best, and perhaps because of that, no patch was
> forthcoming. (Either of Doug's fixes is fine by me..)
>
> So..
> PR 5303, 5755
> * arange-set.c: Delete.
> * arange-set.h: Delete.
> * dwarf2.c: Revert 2007-09-21 changes.
> * Makefile.am: Likewise.
> * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
> * po/SRC-POTFILES.in: Regenerate.
>
> --
> Alan Modra
> Australia Development Lab, IBM
>