This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR gas/5534: "XXX PTR" isn't checked properly inIntelsyntax


On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 08:59:29AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >Unspecified means size can be unspecified. AnySize means any size
> >is ok.
> 
> But you continue to have Unspecified in places where a size specification
> is a requirement (at least in Intel syntax; I never got any clarification on
> whether AT&T syntax silently enforcing a certain size if none was
> specified is really intended behavior).
> 

As you mentioned above, since for some instructions, the old assembler
selected a default size even in Intel mode when size isn't provided, I
used Unspecified on them. Otherwise, the new assembler will be
incompatible with the old one. I will enforce the operand size on
new instructions for both Intel and AT&T modes when more than 1
size are available.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]