This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Little endian target "binary_little"

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Kai Tietz <Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:09:06 +0930
Subject: Re: PATCH: Little endian target "binary_little"
References: <20070427033347.GA17560@lucon.org> <OF9D96FC04.DC7033D8-ONC12572CA.002D51FF-C12572CA.002F92AD@onevision.de>

On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 10:39:37AM +0200, Kai Tietz wrote:
> I want to introduce an new internal default bfd target "binary_little". 

I don't see the sense in this.  Where does the binary bfd backend use
its bfd_getx or bfd_putx functions?

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: Little endian target "binary_little"
  - From: Kai Tietz

References:
- PATCH: PR binutils/4430: We aren't consistent on displacement in x86 disassembler
  - From: H. J. Lu
- PATCH: Little endian target "binary_little"
  - From: Kai Tietz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]