Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2006 at 09:53:15PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote:
On Dec 11, 2006, at 7:35 AM, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 10:44:33PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
Does anyone see any problems with this patch? I verified that
binutils
builds, that it does not write to the srcdir, and that
distribution
tarballs still include info and gmo files. We don't need the
extra
configure switch used by GCC; src-release's current trick of
configuring in srcdir and making distclean but not maintainer-
clean
handles this correctly.
Committed; let me know if it breaks anything, please.
I am missing gprof.info in the install tree now.
Another fragile automake construct bites the dust. It should be
fixed
now.
I also need this now to avoid a build failure for gas. It's mindlessly
copied from binutils/ld, does it make sense?
Thiemo
2006-12-12 Thiemo Seufer <ths@mips.com>
* Makefile.am (YFLAGS): Define as -d.
* Makefile.in: Regenerate.
Index: gas/Makefile.am
===================================================================
--- gas/Makefile.am 2006-11-15 16:52:15.000000000 +0000
+++ gas/Makefile.am 2006-12-12 13:19:21.000000000 +0000
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
tooldir = $(exec_prefix)/$(target_alias)
YACC = `if [ -f ../bison/bison ] ; then echo ../bison/bison -y -
L../bison/bison ; else echo @YACC@ ; fi`
+YFLAGS = -d
LEX = `if [ -f ../flex/flex ] ; then echo ../flex/flex ; else echo
@LEX@ ; fi`
WARN_CFLAGS = @WARN_CFLAGS@