Re: ld: circle-references in libraries

[Stefan Karlsson <stefan dot karlsson at questab dot com>]

Wolfgang Haidinger wrote:

> To state the -l option multiple, like -lA -lB -lA will work, but is this a 
> good idea? Why is this work: "rotating through all libs until no more 
> object file is added", not done by the linker itself? Or is there any 
> option to advise the linkter to do so?

Excerpt from the manual (section 2.1):

-( archives -)
--start-group archives --end-group

    The archives should be a list of archive files. They may be either 
explicit file names, or `-l' options.

    The specified archives are searched repeatedly until no new 
undefined references are created. Normally, an archive is searched only 
once in the order that it is specified on the command line. If a symbol 
in that archive is needed to resolve an undefined symbol referred to by 
an object in an archive that appears later on the command line, the 
linker would not be able to resolve that reference. By grouping the 
archives, they all be searched repeatedly until all possible references 
are resolved.

    Using this option has a significant performance cost. It is best to 
use it only when there are unavoidable circular references between two 
or more archives.


I think this is what you want.

--
Stefan