This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: arm-elf-ld 2.16.1 crash at bfd/elf32-arm.c:5536
- From: "Shaun Jackman" <sjackman at gmail dot com>
- To: "Nick Clifton" <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:43:07 -0700
- Subject: Re: arm-elf-ld 2.16.1 crash at bfd/elf32-arm.c:5536
- References: <7f45d939050728162929bb9286@mail.gmail.com> <7f45d9390507281741622c194c@mail.gmail.com> <42EA34A6.9050304@redhat.com> <7f45d9390507301517757bf0b7@mail.gmail.com> <42ED1E7E.70202@redhat.com> <7f45d93905080113386f325997@mail.gmail.com> <42EF2F01.7010403@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: "Shaun Jackman" <sjackman at gmail dot com>
On 8/2/05, Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> wrote:
> > It looks like the warning is caused by the machine field of the object
> > file created by objcopy being set to 'no machine' instead of 'ARM'.
> > Can I pass an option to objcopy to change the machine field?
>
> --alt-machine-code 40
$ arm-elf-objcopy -Ibinary -Oelf32-littlearm image.bin image.bin.o
--alt-machine-code=40
arm-elf-objcopy: unknown alternate machine code, ignored
What's the correct value for the `ARM' machine code?
Thanks,
Shaun