This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Add tf [Update binutils for Itanium SDM 2.2]

From: James E Wilson <wilson at specifix dot com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich at novell dot com>
Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:47:22 -0800
Subject: Re: PATCH: Add tf [Update binutils for Itanium SDM 2.2]
References: <20060216001830.GA25716@lucon.org> <43F44699.76F0.0078.0@novell.com> <20060216223149.GA1669@lucon.org> <20060222235413.GA17072@lucon.org> <43FD7A16.76F0.0078.0@novell.com>

On Thu, 2006-02-23 at 00:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This is not right. The purpose of pseudo.[sd] is to test opcodes with omitted operands. So it should be

A comment at the top would make this more obvious.  Probably most of the
test cases should have a comment documenting what they are for. 
Otherwise, people just have to guess, and there is always the risk of
someone guessing wrong.
-- 
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com

References:
- Update binutils for Itanium SDM 2.2
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Update binutils for Itanium SDM 2.2
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: Update binutils for Itanium SDM 2.2
  - From: H. J. Lu
- PATCH: Add tf [Update binutils for Itanium SDM 2.2]
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: Add tf [Update binutils for Itanium SDM 2.2]
  - From: Jan Beulich

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]