This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Commited] Extend BFD hash size table

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Doug Evans <dje at transmeta dot com>
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:04:22 -0800
Subject: Re: [Commited] Extend BFD hash size table
References: <SERRANO3cFBjAUlygJk000001f9@SERRANO.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <43C288FD.3010305@redhat.com> <17346.35342.70891.347765@casey.transmeta.com> <17346.36626.76855.498365@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <43C29E7C.60802@redhat.com> <17346.41527.559422.582142@casey.transmeta.com>

On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:49:43AM -0800, Doug Evans wrote:
> Question: libiberty has hashtab.c.  I don't have an opinion on whether
> bfd should use it (or on the efficiency of its algorithm), but I wonder
> if whatever bfd does use shouldn't live in libiberty?

hashtab.c dones't work with string merge.


H.J.

References:
- RE: [Commited] Extend BFD hash size table
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: [Commited] Extend BFD hash size table
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [Commited] Extend BFD hash size table
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [Commited] Extend BFD hash size table
  - From: Paul Koning
- Re: [Commited] Extend BFD hash size table
  - From: Nick Clifton
- Re: [Commited] Extend BFD hash size table
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]