This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] Arm FPA stfpls

From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>
To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 10:04:16 +0100
Subject: Re: [patch] Arm FPA stfpls
References: <200509012020.31579.paul@codesourcery.com> <200509281539.14092.paul@codesourcery.com> <1128002738.7978.5.camel@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <200509292221.49886.paul@codesourcery.com>

On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 22:21, Paul Brook wrote:
> > As we discussed last night, I think we should leave all obsolete insns
> > as-is.  So *all* FPA insns should remain infix only.  As should teqp,
> > tstp, cmpp & cmnp.
> >
> > This implies, for example, that cmppls is a legacy cmppl insn with infix
> > notation, not cmpp with postfix LS condition.
> 
> The attached patch implements this.
> 
> Tested with cross to arm-none-eabi.
> Ok?

Fine, thanks.

R.

References:
- [patch] Arm FPA stfpls
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [patch] Arm FPA stfpls
  - From: Paul Brook
- Re: [patch] Arm FPA stfpls
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: [patch] Arm FPA stfpls
  - From: Paul Brook

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]