This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and some other targets)

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Kaz Kojima <kkojima at rr dot iij4u dot or dot jp>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 12:55:28 +0930
Subject: Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and some other targets)
References: <20050812133343.GF6906@bubble.grove.modra.org> <873bpf6x6e.fsf@amaterasu.srvr.nix> <20050815161535.GK6906@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20050817.115620.77255277.kkojima@rr.iij4u.or.jp>

Hi Kaz,

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:56:20AM +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
> It seems that the first failure is caused with the wrong ref_count for
> .cranges section and the latter 2 errors are caused with the wrong rawsize
> of .cranges.  I'll check the attached patch in to fix them.

Thanks for looking into this.  I'm curious as to why you need to set
rawsize, as there might be a generic bug somewhere.  Care to explain?

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and someother targets)
  - From: Kaz Kojima

References:
- Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and some other targets)
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and some othertargets)
  - From: Nix
- Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and some other targets)
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Your bfd & ld patch breaks --as-needed on SPARC (and someother targets)
  - From: Kaz Kojima

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]