This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Large data sections support


"H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

> On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 01:22:00AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> > 
>> > Putting it in .lbss won't work with common symbol. But the default
>> > gp size is 8, "sym->st_size > elf_gp_size (abfd))" means any common
>> > symbols bigger than 8 bytes will be put in .lbss automatically by
>> > default. I am not sure if it will work very well with the existing
>> 
>> I see, this patch was hanging around longer than it should so I now
>> hardly recall details.  The treshold for bss/lbss is specified by ABI
>> (as different units must match on relocations used to symbols anyway),
>> so I planned hardwiring in the proper default for elf_gp_size but my
>> last patch simply added -G parameter in ld execution command from gcc
>> SPECs.
>
> The issue is that the existing relocatable files may have old
> relocations against common symbols larger than 8 bytes, expecting 
> those symbols will be in .bss sections. Will it still work with your
> scheme?

Shouldn't the threshold for putting stuff in the .l sections be very
high?  Like, megabytes?

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]