This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: HEAD b0rked re coff-tic80?
- From: "Dave Korn" <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
- To: "'Nick Clifton'" <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 13:06:23 +0100
- Subject: RE: HEAD b0rked re coff-tic80?
----Original Message----
>From: Dave Korn
>Sent: 28 April 2005 11:44
> ----Original Message----
>> From: Nick Clifton
>> Sent: 28 April 2005 11:36
>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>>> There's something more fundamental here, isn't there? Presumably
>>> obj-coff.h and tc-i386.h have not previously been being included in the
>>> same compilation unit. Previously it was coff-tic80.h and the system's
>>> /usr/include/_ansi.h, so something's now pulling lots of coff-related
>>> headers into places they didn't used to be, perhaps?
>>
>> Indeed. How exactly did you configure this toolchain ? And what type
>> of host are you building it on ?
>
>
>
> dk@mace /usr/build/binutils-obj> head -7 config.status | tail -1
> # /usr/build/binutils-src/src/configure --prefix=/usr/build/install -v
> dk@mace /usr/build/binutils-obj> /usr/build/binutils-src/src/config.guess
> i686-pc-cygwin
> dk@mace /usr/build/binutils-obj>
Oops. Wrong build dir. Host still applies, but configure command did of
course have all targets enabled:
dk@mace /usr/build/binutils-obj-new> head -7 config.status | tail -1
# /usr/build/binutils-src/src/configure --prefix=/usr/build/install
--enable-ta
rgets=all -v
..pardon the noise. I'm just trying it again with a freshly-checkedout cvs
tree; if anything changes I'll report.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....