This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Results for 2.15.94 20050118 testsuite on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnuk
- From: Christian Joensson <christian dot joensson at gmail dot com>
- To: binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:21:18 +0100
- Subject: Results for 2.15.94 20050118 testsuite on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnuk
Aurora SPARC Linux Corona (FC3-ish) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.15.92.0.2-5 - sparc
bison-1.875c-2 - sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-2 - noarch
expect-5.42.1-1 - sparc
gcc-3.4.2-6.fc3 - sparc
gcc4-4.0.0-0.8sparc - sparc
glibc-2.3.3-99 - sparcv9
glibc-2.3.3-99 - sparc64
glibc-headers-2.3.3-99 - sparc64
glibc-kernheaders-2.6-17sparc - sparc
kernel-2.6.10-1.1063sp2 - sparc64
package kernel-smp is not installed
make-3.80-3 - sparc
nptl-devel-2.3.3-99 - sparcv9
tcl-8.4.5-7 - sparc
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Jan 18 09:52:45 UTC 2005
Native configuration is sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
=== binutils tests ===
Running target unix
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 33
=== gas tests ===
Running target unix
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes 82
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
ERROR: /usr/local/src/trunk/src/ld/testsuite/ld-elfvers/vers22a.c: compilation failed
UNRESOLVED: vers22a
FAIL: vers22
FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared transitions
FAIL: TLS -fno-pic -shared
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 203
# of unexpected failures 3
# of expected failures 31
# of unresolved testcases 1
version: 2.15.94 20050118
Platform: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu
configure flags: sparc64-linux --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared
Counting all warnings,
there are 31 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
10 libiberty/concat.c
6 libiberty/regex.c
2 include/xregex2.h
1 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/gas/config/tc-sparc.c
1 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/bfd/libbfd.c
1 lex.yy.c
Number of warning types:
10 traditional C rejects ISO C style function definitions
10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
2 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
1 'yyunput' defined but not used
1 conflicting types for built-in function 'log2'
1 comparison between signed and unsigned