This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: .eh_frame section on alpha
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- To: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, Simon Burge <simonb at wasabisystems dot com>, Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:51:11 -0800
- Subject: Re: .eh_frame section on alpha
- References: <20041229073919.8EEE02356C@thoreau.thistledown.com.au> <41DA653D.6030101@redhat.com> <20050104095809.GQ3168@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz> <41DA6C6B.1090807@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:14:03AM +0000, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Presumably yes. But I assume that the feeling is that invoking an
> assembler switch is simpler for the user than requiring them to write or
> edit linker scripts.
If you're writing boot loaders, you're already writing linker scripts.
r~