This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: .cfi_startproc simple


Now, any suggestion on the approach to fix this? Just zero out the two
fields (register and offset)? Or have the target specific code
initialize them, too (just to different values than without the 'simple'
modifier)? In the latter case, I wouldn't even know how I would have to
approach this, since this would require changing all targets, and I
obviously wouldn't know for most of them what the appropriate
register/offset combination would be.

Thanks, Jan

>>> Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> 29.11.04 19:55:19 >>>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:35:12AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Is it intentional that this directive inherits (rather than clears)
the
> previous procedure's exit state (namely cur_cfa_offset)?

No.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]