This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: gas .warning "msg" and .error "msg" directives?


Hi Hans-Peter,

Why not make it default to something that actually describes the situation, e.g., ".error directive invoked in source file". Conceptually, you could also make the message be required -- for .error that just means you print a slightly different message if it's omitted ("missing .error parameter" for example), the practical difference is whether .warning without a message would be an error or not. :-)


All valid points.  Consider them merged with my suggestion, with:
An .error without a string should be compatible with ".err" and
just emit ".error directive invoked in source file".  A .warning
should just warn, with the default message being...you guessed
it ".warning directive invoked in source file".

Ok - if you would care to post a patch like that, along with a case or two for the testsuite then I would be happy to review it.


Cheers
  Nick



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]