This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: section-relative relocs on ia64 (was: Re: Why doesslurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?)

From: James E Wilson <wilson at specifixinc dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: David Mosberger <davidm at hpl dot hp dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 17:33:44 -0700
Subject: Re: section-relative relocs on ia64 (was: Re: Why doesslurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?)
References: <20041021161704.GA24203@lucon.org> <16760.52050.242250.242958@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20041025161605.GA28456@lucon.org> <16766.6758.881479.519647@napali.hpl.hp.com> <20041026211351.GA23236@lucon.org>

On Tue, 2004-10-26 at 14:13, H. J. Lu wrote:
> 	PR 475
> 	* elfxx-ia64.c (elfNN_ia64_relocate_section): Correct
> 	R_IA64_SECREL32MSB, R_IA64_SECREL32LSB, R_IA64_SECREL64MSB
> 	and R_IA64_SECREL64LSB.

Thanks.
-- 
Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.SpecifixInc.com

References:
- Why does slurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Why does slurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?
  - From: David Mosberger
- Re: Why does slurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- section-relative relocs on ia64 (was: Re: Why does slurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?)
  - From: David Mosberger
- Re: section-relative relocs on ia64 (was: Re: Why does slurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?)
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]