This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: section-relative relocs on ia64 (was: Re: Why does slurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?)

From: David Mosberger <davidm at napali dot hpl dot hp dot com>
To: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 02:44:37 -0700
Subject: Re: section-relative relocs on ia64 (was: Re: Why does slurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?)
References: <20041021161704.GA24203@lucon.org><16760.52050.242250.242958@napali.hpl.hp.com><20041025161605.GA28456@lucon.org><16766.6758.881479.519647@napali.hpl.hp.com>
Reply-to: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com

>>>>> On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 02:35:34 -0700, David Mosberger <davidm@linux.hpl.hp.com> said:

  David> I'll provide the details in the bug-report.

For completeness, here the reference to the bug-report:

  http://www.sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=475

Thanks,

	--david

References:
- Why does slurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: Why does slurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?
  - From: David Mosberger
- Re: Why does slurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?
  - From: H. J. Lu
- section-relative relocs on ia64 (was: Re: Why does slurp_ia64_unwind_table complain unwind symbol type?)
  - From: David Mosberger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]