This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: i386 intel syntax integer load/store fp instructions


On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:38:21AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Since the patch to remove the (superfluous) Intel syntax fildd, fistpd,
> and fisttpd instructions (24Jun2004) left intact the comments saying the
> next instruction would be Intel syntax, these comments now appear to
> apply to fildq, fistpq, and fisttpq respectively. Whether this is
> correct I cannot judge since I haven't been able to locate a formal AT&T
> syntax specification (in order to see whether these instructions
> actually exist there).

I believe the correct instructions are ones with an 'll' suffix rather
than 'q'.  However, a quick google search shows that people use the
first two instructions in att mode.  fisttpq doesn't get many hits.

I think they should remain valid in att mode.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]