This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: m68k reloc types


Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 11:38:09AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Agreed, although probably much less in C++.  But if they are references
>> more than once in a function then cse'ing the address is usually faster
>> anyway.
>
> I wasn't aware that m68k had so many free registers that it 

More than i386 anyway. :-)

> is unconcerned about spilling once the function grows to a
> non-trivial size.

Well, there is a trade between using a addressing mode that wastes 4 bytes
for every use and spilling a register here and there.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]