This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Results for binutils 2.15.91 20040520 testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
- From: Christian Joensson <christian at j-son dot org>
- To: binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 13:38:59 +0200
- Subject: Results for binutils 2.15.91 20040520 testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
Fedora Core 2 (Tettnang) ia32 pentium III dual i686:
binutils-2.15.90.0.3-5
bison-1.875-7.1
dejagnu-1.4.2-11
expect-5.39.0-96.1
gcc-3.3.3-7
glibc-2.3.3-27
glibc-kernheaders-2.4-8.44
kernel-smp-2.6.5-1.358
tcl-8.4.5-7
LAST_UPDATED: Thu May 20 09:14:14 UTC 2004
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== binutils tests ===
Running target unix/-fPIC
=== binutils Summary for unix/-fPIC ===
# of expected passes 33
Running target unix
=== binutils Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes 33
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 66
=== gas tests ===
Running target unix/-fPIC
=== gas Summary for unix/-fPIC ===
# of expected passes 79
Running target unix
=== gas Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes 79
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes 158
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix/-fPIC
FAIL: S-records
FAIL: S-records with constructors
=== ld Summary for unix/-fPIC ===
# of expected passes 209
# of unexpected failures 2
# of expected failures 2
Running target unix
=== ld Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes 211
# of expected failures 2
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 420
# of unexpected failures 2
# of expected failures 4
version: binutils 2.15.91 20040520
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: pentium3-linux --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-binutils --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --with-system-zlib
Counting all warnings,
there are 24 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
10 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/bucomm.c
6 libiberty/regex.c
4 include/fibheap.h
2 include/xregex2.h
1 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/bfd/elflink.c
1 lex.yy.c
Number of warning types:
10 the use of \`???' is dangerous, better use \`???'
6 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
4 bit-field \`???' type invalid in ISO C
2 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators
1 left shift count >= width of type
1 \`???' defined but not used