This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support
- From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 17:47:57 +0100
- Subject: Re: [rfa] ARM .cfi_* support
- References: <20040409210142.GA31470@nevyn.them.org> <20040422163114.GA32198@nevyn.them.org>
On Thu, 2004-04-22 at 17:31, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 05:01:42PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > This has been kicking around in my tree for a while now. It adds support
> > for the .cfi_* directives, using the standard or FPA registers - I didn't
> > bother adding any of the other coprocessor registers, since their numbering
> > is still a little unclear, and usually the general purpose registers are all
> > you need.
> >
> > Tested on arm-elf. OK?
>
> Ping?
Sorry, missed this one (if you will post messages on a UK public
holiday...)
I think that we should be looking to move to the EABI DWARF register
numbers soon (http://www.arm.com/products/DevTools/abi/aadwarf.pdf). I
would rather that we didn't introduce new uses of the old register
numbering schemes.
R.