This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 11:34:18AM +0900, tanaka wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
ld's help says,
-q, --emit-relocs Generate relocations in final output
so, ld should emit relocation information at the offset 00000014, shouldn't it?
That's debatable. What it actually means is, relocations from the input files are preserved in the output.
best regards.
------ tanaka
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 02:06:49PM +0900, tanaka wrote:
Hello,
LD for ARM does not emits relocation information for the address which is in the interworking code When executed with -q option.
------------ test.r -------------- test: file format elf32-littlearm
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.text]: OFFSET TYPE VALUE 00000000 R_ARM_PC24 main
I think
00000014 ?????? ?????
is missing. Is this bug?
No. Or at least, not really.
0010000c <__main_from_arm>:
10000c: e59fc000 ldr ip, [pc, #0] ; 100014 <__main_from_arm+0x8>
100010: e12fff1c bx ip
100014: 00100005 andeqs r0, r0, r5
-----------------------------------
This is a statically linked executable. The linker fills in the address of main, but has no reason to use a relocation to do so.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |