This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)

Hi Carlo,

>> FWIW I tried compiling the test case attached to the above message
>> using a version of g++ built from today's sources and running on an
>> x86 linux box, and then I used three different versions of readelf to
>> try to get different results - I failed - all three produced the same
>> output:
>
> Of course, the bug is not in readelf but in ld.
> You will have to install the complete binutils before compiling
> the testcase.  Then you can use a readelf from any version to
> see what the .debug_info is.

Ah - but that is the point - I *did* use a copy of ld built from
today's binutils sources.  And this version of ld produced a binary
that appears to be correct.

Would it be possible for you to check to see if you can still
reproduce the problem using today's binutils sources ?

Cheers
        Nick
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]