This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 09:25:55AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
Hello,
What would be the reaction to having "typedef asection"s underlying struct renamed to "struct bfd_section"? The objective here is to make an official namespace-proof opaque declaration available to clients. I asked about "struct sec" and got all sorts of pushback.
Seems reasonable.
A rollout would be as follows: - #define bfd_section sec
Won't work. include/elf/internal.h: asection * bfd_section;
- go through the code base and s/struct sec/struct bfd_section/ - update the definition
Hit the lot in one go. I count less than 30 files in /src that use struct sec directly.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |