This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Why bfd_section_<op> (*BFD*, sec, ...?)
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at wasabisystems dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 11 Oct 2003 08:35:46 -0700
- Subject: Re: Why bfd_section_<op> (*BFD*, sec, ...?)
- References: <3F880669.5060706@redhat.com>
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
> Why do the section operators take a BFD when the SEC already has a BFD
> back-pointer? Vis: bfd_get_section_name et.al.
Historical.
Ian