This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Patch] ld config bits for i860 coff target


Hi Guys,

> Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> writes:

> I agree with Zack.  If we can achieve that, then I think the generated
> files could be removed from CVS too.  No problem then with churn, which
> is the major reason to have "blessed" versions of auto-tools.  (At least
> these days.  When Ian put that version onto the ftp site, there was no
> released version of auto-tools that worked reliably with binutils.)
>
> As I said on irc, I don't really like the idea of recommending a
> particular autoconf/automake version.  Having an officially blessed
> version makes us (binutils) lazy in keeping up to date in our
> Makefile.am/autoconf.ac files, and also means that the latest auto-tools
> might not be tested as well as they could be.

Seconded.  If we can make binutils work with modern versions of the
tools and remove the need to a particular, blessed, version then I am
all for it.

Cheers
        Nick
        


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]