This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 10:43:07AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 09:10:18AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 07:38:06AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 25, 2003 at 01:25:31PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > > > > Hi H.J. > > > > > > > > > Here is the new patch. It caused no regressions on all targets > > > > > affected. It fixed an ELF/ppc64 bug. > > > > > > > > Excellent. > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > Approved - please apply. > > > > > > > > > > Done. I made a small change. I used > > > > > > if (! BFD_SEND ((B), _new_section_hook, ((B), (S)))) \ > > > > > > instead of > > > > > > if (!_bfd_elf_new_section_hook ((B), (S))) \ > > > > > > > My patch mishandled the case: > > > > .section .foo,"aw",@nobits > > > > I checked in the following patch as an obvious fix. > > > > It is not enough. "ld -r" is broken with > > .section .foo,"aw",@nobits > .space 20 > > Here is a patch. > > It is still not enough. We shouldn't abort on processor specific section types. H.J.
Attachment:
binutils-type-fix.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |