This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] unify dynamic_symbol_p implementations

From: Bob Wilson <bwilson at tensilica dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 15:16:12 -0700
Subject: Re: [RFC] unify dynamic_symbol_p implementations
Organization: Tensilica, Inc.
References: <200307181202.40668.bwilson@tensilica.com> <20030718220239.GE5270@redhat.com> <20030718220412.GA23962@nevyn.them.org>

On Friday 18 July 2003 15:04, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 03:02:39PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > Um, unless I'm missing something, this means you compiled the
> > test case with -fpic or such.  I want the main executable.
>
> I'm pretty sure Xtensa, like MIPS/Linux, defaults to PIC
> applications...

Right.  We always set -fpic for Xtensa/Linux.  There are only minor code 
differences for PIC vs. non-PIC on Xtensa targets, so we just set it all the 
time.  I don't understand this well enough to be confident that it works in 
all cases.  If you still think there might be issues, I'd welcome any more 
suggestions of issues to investigate.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] unify dynamic_symbol_p implementations
  - From: Richard Henderson

References:
- Re: [RFC] unify dynamic_symbol_p implementations
  - From: Bob Wilson
- Re: [RFC] unify dynamic_symbol_p implementations
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [RFC] unify dynamic_symbol_p implementations
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]