This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: elf64-ppc.c *r_offset patch

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 19:19:06 +0930
Subject: Re: elf64-ppc.c *r_offset patch
References: <20030614102652.GE24872@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20030614125547.GV23826@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20030614151535.N15481@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030614235412.GW23826@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20030615001712.GX23826@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20030615085622.P15481@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030616040839.GB23826@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20030616080448.GB20507@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20030616092234.GC23826@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20030616053720.R15481@devserv.devel.redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 05:37:20AM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> What I meant is if setting relocation = 0; addend = 0; won't cause
> pc_relative relocs to end up with -r_offset at *r_offset.

Uh, yeah, we'll get that wrong.  Tweak needed.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: elf64-ppc.c *r_offset patch
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- Re: elf64-ppc.c *r_offset patch
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: elf64-ppc.c *r_offset patch
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: elf64-ppc.c *r_offset patch
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: elf64-ppc.c *r_offset patch
  - From: Jakub Jelinek

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]